Saturday, December 07, 2024

About footnotes

I ruddy love footnotes, I do, and have been told off by more than one editor for using too many of them. Apparently their presence disturbs readers, presumably because it reminds them that for every book they do read, there are several hundred more waiting round the corner to ambush them. Which to me would be a lovely feeling, but what do I know?

That said, I do share the frustration of absolutely knowing something’s true and yet not being able to find a reference to validate it. Which is why I love this passage:

I have in my head an assertion that a friend once told me was written by Whitney Balliett, the jazz critic and exemplary listener-describer. The assertion was that there were only two absolute virtuoso figures in jazz: Sarah Vaughan and Art Tatum. When did Balliett write it? I can’t say. Neither can I be sure that he did write it. Once you get inside a writer’s voice, you can imagine things he didn’t actually write. Once I troubled Whitney, in his old age, about a phrase of his I swore I had read — something about Lester Young playing “wheaty” notes. He said it sounded possible, and went to look it up. He searched for a couple days and came up-handed. I might have dreamed it.

Ben Ratliff, Every Song Ever: Twenty Ways to Listen to Music Now (London: Allen Lane, 2016), p. 81.

2 comments:

savannah said...

I read this to my husband because we feel as you regarding footnotes! BUT, he got stuck on the assertion about Sarah Vaughan and Art Tatum being the "only two virtuoso..." and proceeded to "lecture" me on all the other possible considerations for that status. Yes, he went down the rabbit hole of jazz greats! xoxo

expat@large said...

Have you read Michel Faber’s Listen?
Just askin’.
And apropos of footnotes: the antagonist of Gilbert Sorrentino’s Mulligan Stew is a character who only existed previously in a footnote in Finnegans Wake.
Just sayin’.